London 2012: Greenest Games Ever?

When London won its bid to host the 2012 Olympics, organizers promised to put sustainability at the heart of the event. Despite falling short on some goals, campaigners say they have largely kept their promise.

Published

11 months ago

Categories

Science, Climate & Environment

Places

London, United Kingdom, Bhopal

Companies

McDonald's Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, ArcelorMittal S.A. (pre merger)

Transcript

SCRIPT: When London won its bid to host the 2012 Olympics, organisers promised 'the greenest games ever.' Sustainability would be at the heart of the event, with a huge industrial area of East London transformed into a verdant landscaped park, home for generations to come. The London organisers say their holistic approach marks them out from previous Olympics. SOUNDBITE 1 David Stubbs, Head of Sustainability, London 2012 (English, 15 secs): "It's the first time really that anyone's taken all the different aspects of Games operation, from transport to logistics, waste management, catering, accommodation, security, technology, all those different aspects, and looked at ways of trying to make them more sustainable as a whole thing." To create the Olympic park, two million tonnes of contaminated soil was cleaned up, to become a wetland park planted with 300 thousand plants and 2000 native trees. Moreover, all the visitors to the Games will be arriving by public transport. A watchdog set up to monitor London 2012's efforts at staying green say the organisers have by and large kept their promise. SOUNDBITE 2 Shaun McCarthy, Chairman, Commission for a Sustainable London 2012 (English, 9 secs): "Is London 2012 the most sustainable games ever? Yes. I think it's more sustainable than Sydney, and I think the legacy has the potential to be better than Barcelona." The commission has praised the construction techniques used for the venues, in particular the energy-efficient velodrome. Food outlets will also serve sustainably-sourced fish and meat. Nonetheless, while it's happy to award London 2012 a gold medal, it falls a little short of a perfect ten. SOUNDBITE 3 Shaun McCarthy, Chairman, Commission for a Sustainable London 2012 (English, 30 secs): "The carbon objectives and renewable energy objectives were not achieved, so I think the energy strategy at the beginning could have been better. I'm quite disappointed around the merchandise - I think there was a real opportunity to do something distinctly different around merchandising, and to sell things that are overtly sustainable, with different, funky, new designs, where frankly we've just got the same old stuff in slightly better recycled packaging, so I think those are definitely areas for improvement." Plans to light the Olympic torch with sustainable fuel also went up in smoke. Yet London 2012's sustainable credentials can only really be assessed long after the athletes have packed up and gone. For it to be judged a success, in place of the peeling paint and rusting venues associated with some previous Olympics, East London will need to be home to the thriving new community that Games organisers have always promised. SHOTLIST: LONDON, UK, Various dates Source: AFPTV/LOCOG -Pan Olympic stadium (June 2012) -VAR views of Olympic park -Pan of park showing green landscaped areas -SOUNDBITE 1 (12 July 2012) -VAR soil being cleaned on land used for Olympic park (Source: LOCOG - NO RESALE/EDITORIAL USE ONLY) - VAR parkland with visitors -SOUNDBITE 2 (13 July 2012) -WS exterior of Olympic velodrome (Source: LOCOG - NO RESALE/EDITORIAL USE ONLY) -Pan interior of Olympic velodrome (February 2012) -GV McDonalds restaurant in Olympic park (June 2012) -VAR Olympic village (12 July 2012) -SOUNDBITE 3 (13 July 2012) -VAR Michael Johnson with Olympic torch (12 July 2012, Source: LOCOG - NO RESALE/EDITORIAL USE ONLY) -GVs of Olympic village (12 July 2012) -Sculpture of Olympic rings in Olympic village (12 July 2012) ---------------------------------------------------- The greenest Olympics ever -- but is it good enough? by Judith Evans LONDON, July 13, 2012 (AFP) - Despite dozens of compromises since London's winning bid seven years ago promised an idyllic eco-Olympics with a "clean" flame, this year's Games are still set to be the greenest ever. Even environmental campaigners say London 2012 will surpass all others in the modern era, with Sydney in 2000 the only serious runner-up and the smog-clogged Beijing Olympics in 2008 lagging behind. Friends of the Earth senior campaigner Jane Thomas told AFP: "There's been some huge principles that have been good -- about no private vehicles arriving, recycling, the water supply, the principle of reusing the facilities. "That's already set a benchmark for things that come in the future, and that can only be applauded." When the Games start on July 27, spectators will take public transport -- thanks to a deliberate lack of parking spaces -- to an east London Olympic park studded with recycling bins aimed at a tough "zero waste to landfill" target. The former industrial site has been cleaned up, with two million tonnes of contaminated soil washed in an on-site "soil hospital", to become a wetland park planted with 300,000 plants and 2,000 native trees. Millions of meals of sustainably-sourced fish and local meat in compostable containers will be bought at a giant, entirely recyclable McDonald's, whose cooking oil will become biodiesel to power its trucks. And fans will watch cycling greats in a showpiece energy-efficient, naturally ventilated arena, half the weight of the Beijing velodrome. "We've put a marker in the sand for managing sustainable events," David Stubbs, head of sustainability for London 2012, told AFP. Sydney's Games left a legacy of solar panels and a big urban renewal project, but Stubbs said London had gone much further. Beijing installed large areas of solar panels but sustainability standards were patchy in other areas, while many of that Games' lavish purpose-built venues are now crumbling. "The Green Games programme in Sydney was brilliant but Athens and Beijing didn't really follow up," said Shaun McCarthy, head of the Commission for a Sustainable London 2012, a watchdog for the Games. London has, however, made its own concessions to practicality. These have included axing an on-site wind turbine, halving renewable energy use from a planned 20 percent, and lighting the Olympic flame with ordinary propane and butane. The sustainability commission criticised other decisions including heavy steel use in the "pointless" Arcelor Mittal Orbit, a 114.5-metre tall, 1,500-tonne tower. It also lamented the production of tonnes of merchandise from polluting plastics with no guarantee of an ethical supply chain. Games sponsorship has meanwhile become so contentious that campaigners set up an ironic award, "Greenwash Gold", for the sponsor covering up the worst environmental offences. The main stadium's wrap advertises Dow Chemical, which owns the firm behind the 1984 Bhopal disaster, while metal for the prized Olympic medals comes from a Utah mine where owners Rio Tinto face a pollution lawsuit. "Dow, with the Union Carbide factory, is particularly problematic... they could have done an awful lot more to have progressed that satisfactorily and taken on the moral responsibility," said Friends of the Earth's Thomas. Some London green activists have meanwhile wrangled with whether to support a one-off event requiring huge construction work and mass air travel. Jenny Jones, Green Party member of the London Assembly, said: "If we wanted to keep hosting these extravagant Games every four years, the greenest option would be to tour around four or five cities that already have everything in place." Campaigners say the Games' green credentials can only really be assessed afterwards. Keen to avoid "white elephant" venues, organisers want the site to stay in use and regenerate a deprived area. But the main stadium has yet to find a long-term occupant, and in an unpromising sign, Andy Altman, head of the London Legacy Development Corporation, recently announced he would resign in August. Sponsor Coca-Cola has however developed a permanent new recycling plant in Lincolnshire in the east, while McDonald's says it will make lasting changes to its British supply chain. McCarthy said the International Olympic Committee should demand far more such commitments. "The sponsors are keen to get involved -- they're not dragging them there kicking and screaming," he said. Thomas said the very prominence of the green debate was a sign of progress. "It's the first time anyone's tried to judge it through a green prism, and that tells us we're moving in the right direction," she said.